Infringement of any ethical guidelines may result in disqualification of the project. The results of the content analysis of this study did not support this finding In the current sample, telehealth PE treatment was safe and pragmatically viable.
The book suggests that you write this list with the help of a sympathetic listener who knows the project, like a supervisor.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
This means the studies outlined should lead logically into your aims and hypotheses. DO NOT include any raw data. Treatment noncompletion rates, although higher than average for our clinic, were in the acceptable range.
Make sure the results are presented clearly and concisely. Numbers which can never exceed 1. Only give enough detail for someone to replicate experiment - be concise in your writing. In simple terms every time you refer to a name and date of a psychologist you need to reference the original source of the information.
The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data. This was a cross-sectional research design that relied on survey data.
This is often placed in an Appendix. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. Although these studies show attributions can be made using all this information, it does not prove that they normally are Although the scale of the current situation poses challenges to both service providers and veterans, it also presents unprecedented opportunities for scientific investigation and the continued development of evidence-based interventions for PTSD.
However, there is little empirical evidence to support this belief or to guide the treatment of PTSD in individuals with co-occurring SUDs.
The purpose of the introduction is to explain where your hypothesis comes from. You should only withhold information if the research cannot be carried out any other way. Your style should be brief, but not using note form. The discussion section should end with a concise summary of the principal implications of the findings regardless of significance.
Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. Limitations and directions for future research are also commonly addressed. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of research in the social sciences is to discover and not to prove.
Writing in Psychology course syllabus. If the study has found a reliable effect be very careful suggesting limitations as you are doubting your results. Experimentation with animals should only rarely be attempted.
M, SD, t, X2, F, p, d. Acknowledge limitations, but only if they can explain the result obtained. This part of the discussion should begin with a description of any unanticipated findings, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study.
How to reference this article: Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: In view of the potential problems associated with medication, the results of this study support the view that young people with OCD should, therefore, be offered CBT as the firstline treatment by child and adolescent mental health services.
•About Writing in Psychology •Common Assignments •Writing a Literature Review •Writing a Research will contain a modified results and discussion section with predicted results and books written by scholars in the field). The results section of a paper usually present the descriptive statistics followed by inferential statistics.
Avoid interpreting the results (save this for the discussion). Make Author: Saul Mcleod. How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Things to Avoid When Writing the Discussion Overinterpretation of the Results That Are Not Supported by the Data Summary Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a.
The discussion section is the most important part of your dissertation, and you'll need to make sure you have all the vital ingredients of a great discussion.
The check-list below includes a list of the important things you should include in your discussion. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases.
This is especially important when describing the discovery of significant or unanticipated findings. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (February. When writing a dissertation or thesis, the results and discussion sections can be both the most interesting as well as the most challenging sections to write.
You may choose to write these sections separately, or combine them into a single chapter, depending on your university’s guidelines and your own preferences.Writing a discussion section psychology books